Leading change? Create a sense of urgency.

So many leaders that I talk to lament how difficult it is to effect change.  The most seemingly minor changes require Herculean efforts to implement as employees kick, balk, and sabotage.

One CEO recently complained to me of the ridiculous amount of time he spent listening to complaints and talking to employees about the adoption of a new coffee making system while they offered every reason why they should keep the old system.  (Okay, as a tea drinker, I get that.  I’ve watched in dismay as k-cups have taken over the universe, because I’ve never had a cup of tea from a k-cup that I thought tasted good.  But, as they say, I digress.)

Change isn’t easy, even when driven from the top.  Early in my career I worked for a company president who lamented how difficult it was to change anything from the top of an organization.  He was a pretty progressive guy for the time.  He’d been off to Tom Peters’ skunk camp and was extremely dedicated to running a company that treated both its customers and its employees well.  He was frustrated because he wanted to do lots of great things but they involved change, and getting people to adapt to the changes that he offered was so hard.

It wasn’t that he was a bad guy or even that the changes he wanted to make were inherently bad.  But they were changes, and people essentially distrust and dislike change – especially if they don’t see an urgency to do so.

You have got to have a sense of urgency.  People typically change because they want to avoid something that they believe will happen without the change.  Despite that, if there is not a sufficient sense of urgency, they still don’t change.

Think about losing that extra 10 pounds.  You know that if you don’t do something it will turn into 12 pounds, and then 15, and then 20. But it creeps up slowly.  It’s not until you receive the invitation to your class reunion that you feel sufficiently moved by a sense of urgency to actually hit the gym and cut the processed carbs.

John Kotter, who wrote the book on Leading Change finds this first step so important that he followed his classic book with another book entirely devoted to A Sense of Urgency.”  Kotter says that creating the necessary sense of urgency is the hardest, yet most important, step in implementing a change effort.

Creating urgency.  One of Kotter’s solutions is to create a crisis.  Having seen people beaten down dealing with the crisis du jour too many times, I struggle with that one, but I do see his point.  Nothing rallies people to change faster than a major crisis.

I like the idea of hitting people (bombard is the word Kotter uses) with information about potential opportunities for the organization, as well as the rich reward within those opportunities; then explaining why those opportunities can’t be realized without change.

And although this surely seems self-serving on my part, I also agree with his idea of using consultants to force honest discussions.  It is sometimes simply too easy for insiders to become complacent and delude themselves by not taking a square look at the facts.

If you’ve tried recently to effect change, only to find yourself frustrated, you’ve got to ask yourself “What’s the sense of urgency?”

Posted in Leading change, Resources for Leaders | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Downtime is essential for leadership effectiveness

jerry - Olympic PennSome of a leader’s best thinking and learning occurs in that space in-between when all is still.  It’s known as the creative pause, a term probably coined by the best-selling author Edward de Bono, and it refers to the increasingly rare downtime that leaders have to rest and to quietly reflect.

Between the ultra-connected world that we live in, demands created by the current economy, and an often misguided work ethic, many leaders have lost touch with what it means to have true downtime.  Some carry as a badge of honor, the number of days, or even weeks, of vacation time that they lost in a given year due to non-use.  Many just don’t understand how important structured and real time off is to leadership productivity and effectiveness.

Benefits of structured time off.  A study conducted by Leslie Perlow of Harvard University demonstrated that structured time off was beneficial to individuals and organizations in a number of ways.  We all know how personally beneficial a vacation is and how refreshed we are when we return to work.  Perlow’s study, which mandated that participants take extra time off, showed that not only did work product and client satisfaction NOT suffer, but that the firm benefited from the conversations that took place around how to make the extra time off work.  Apparently, the added engagement around the work process was beneficial in itself.

To their detriment, Leaders are uber-connected.  For the typical leader, true downtime – time when we can be completely disconnected and “off” – is increasingly rare.  Many leaders feel compelled – or are pressured – to be accessible at all times.  Technology has not been our friend in this regard; spaces that used to be sacrosanct, are no longer so.  In our uber-connected world, we simply cannot hide.  Even when we are not working, we are constantly “on” and monitoring our technology.  In this sense, many leaders are never “off.”

Obstacle to learning.  This constantly plugged-in state is stressful.  It deprives us of the rest we need to really rejuvenate and it impedes our learning.  The New York Times reported on the ill effects of all this hyper-connectivity in an article entitled “Digital devices deprive brain of needed downtime.”  The author cited a University of California study that demonstrated with rats the necessity of taking breaks in order to inculcate new learning.  This reinforced what we already know from human studies about the role that sleep has in processing new learning.  The researchers believed that downtime was essential to allow the brain to review and solidify long term learning.

Taxing to the brain.  Some leaders claim to use digital devices such as iPods or game apps to unwind (sort of a micro-vacation), but another study cited in the NYTimes article, this time at the University of Michigan, led researchers to conclude that technological stimulation appears to “overtax” the brain and that we’d be better off with a walk in the woods.

Sounds good to me.

Posted in Balance, Self-management | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leaders under stress: Pay attention to lifestyle factors

Many leaders compound the stress inherent in leadership responsibilities with the additional stress experienced by our bodies and minds when we don’t care for ourselves properly.  I have learned that three lifestyle factors are essential for me to operate effectively.  Without them my ability to manage stress goes right out the window.

  1.  Proper nutrition:  Food is the fuel that makes our bodies run.  To fight stress we need a diet that is rich in whole grains, vitamins, and minerals, to lower high blood pressure and strengthen the immune system.  In addition, according to this WebMD slide show, certain foods, like oranges, tea, and almonds have specific stress-busting properties.
  2. Physical activity:  Exercise is a powerful anecdote to stress; it reduces muscle tension and increases brain oxygen.  Maybe most important, exercise increases endorphins, those little protein molecules that are responsible for a whole host of good things including mitigation of stress (and slowing down the aging process, if you are interested).
  3. Adequate rest:  Sleep doesn’t always come easily when the workload is heavy.  A colleague of mine refers to ‘working horizontally.’  She’s not  referring to the oldest profession in the world, but rather her propensity to lay in bed with all of yesterday’s and tomorrow’s problems swirling around in her head. But here’s the beauty of what I’ve learned.  If I am eating right and getting my exercise, sleep comes more easily.  In fact, all three of these stress fighting behaviors work better in tandem.  (Who feels like exercising with no sleep and a lousy diet anyway?)

A certain amount of stress in inevitable in leadership.  Taking proper care of ourselves can help us cope with much more grace and resilience.

Posted in Self-management, Stress | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Four step plan for cleaning up unresolved issues and projects

Those issues that you know you need to address but just haven’t gotten to, and those half-finished projects, often the result of multitasking (see prior post: Multitasking: a less effective way to cope), are like the proverbial ball and chain that weigh us down.  Over time, unresolved issues contribute just as much stress, if not more, as projects that we are actively working on.  April is National Stress Awareness month so it’s a good time to resolve to tackle unresolved issues and projects using the following four step plan.

  1. Make a list. The best place to start is by listing all of the projects and issues that you are procrastinating on or “just haven’t gotten around to.”  Then honestly ask yourself which ones should be taken off the list entirely.  There is something tremendously liberating about admitting to yourself that you are NOT going to do something.  Cross it off and tell it to stop plaguing you.
  2. Delegate. Look at what is left on the list and ask yourself what you can delegate.  Remember that keeping everything for yourself does nothing to develop your people.  They are more anxious to take on new challenges than you might realize.  The time you invest in training will pay off next time.  If there is truly no one available for you to delegate TO, think creatively.  You can hire people in any specialty for one-off or reoccurring projects, without putting them on your payroll.  Use an internet service like Elance or, if using the internet feels dicey or you prefer to deal directly with a person, hire a professional virtual assistant (ask me if you want to know who I work with).
  3. Schedule.  Once you’ve made your list and whittled it down by crossing off or delegating, look at what’s left and schedule it.  If you know that you won’t start the project for two weeks, that’s okay.  Getting it on the schedule is almost as satisfying as crossing it off.
  4. Just do it.  The projects that we most dread are seldom as onerous as we expect them to be.  Once you get into the zone, you’ll be done and then you can cross that one off too!
Posted in Self-management, Stress | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Multitasking: A less effective way to cope

MultitaskingStress is inevitable.  Deadlines, decisions, presentations, staff issues, the economy, and much more conspire to make leadership a stressful endeavor.  Fortunately, we can choose how to deal with stressful circumstances.  Unfortunately, leaders often choose multitasking.

Multitasking, the logical choice.  When overburdened leaders feel stressed out, the first coping mechanism to kick in is multitasking.  The logic seems sound.  After all, I can finish my work in half the time if I do two things at once, right?

Unfortunately, it just doesn’t work.  Our brains are not wired for multitasking, so the closest thing that we can do is switch back and forth between tasks.  Sometimes, we can start a task and start someone else on another task and let them do their thing while we go work on our task.  Then, a little later, we check on them.  If everything is okay, we go back to our other task again.  That type of switching – if the time intervals between switches are sufficient enough – might be effective.

However, when we multitask we often do something a little different.  Typically we try to monitor email while we write a report.  Or we do a webinar while we complete a project.  Or we tell someone, “Go ahead, I’m listening.” while we continue working.

The cost of multitasking.  This kind of switching doesn’t work; we are simply darting back and forth between two tasks and doing neither one particularly well.

In addition, according to Harvard professor, Clifford Nash, WGBH’s Frontline®, there is a ‘task switch cost’ associated with shutting down one part of the brain in order to fire up another part of the brain for the second task.  All this switching is much less effective and it’s costly.

Only part of the cost of multitasking is reflected in additional time and lesser performance.  Multitasking also has a stress cost.  In a study performed by Hiltraut Paridon and Marlen Kaufmann, and reported in Europe’s Journal of Psychology, drivers (simulated) were asked to also perform simple tasks, such as removing tissues from a package or dialing a number on a cell phone.  Drivers who were asked to multitask experienced significant mental stress and had more difficulty staying in their lane, compared to those that were not asked to multitask.

When study participants were asked to perform a word identification exercise while listening to text being read, the multitaskers had comparatively low recall of the text. Interestingly, higher levels of mental stress were not found in the multitaskers compared to the non-multitaskers.  Too bad the researchers didn’t measure the stress response of a live person trying to talk to the multitasker!

The better solution. The next time you are tempted to multitask, consider simply focusing on your tasks sequentially and finishing one before moving on to another.  You’ll probably find that you get more done and enjoy your work more.

Posted in Stress, Time Management | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Coping With Information Overload

Sheer volume of information is one of the greatest stressors that leaders face.   Just like the ringing of a telephone sets off the urge to answer it, the arrival of yet another magazine, electronic newsletter, or social media notification reinforces the obligation to keep up on the information that comes our way.

The problem is that there is simply too much information.  We cannot possibly keep up with it all.  So we feel guilty, ashamed, and stressed out, while we try diligently to come up with better and more innovative ways to process more.

There are better ways to cope.

Get real.  The first step is to realize that you CAN’T read everything and there is no point beating yourself up about it.  Life and leadership are about choices.  For everything that we choose to read and process, there is something else that we will need to forego.  Just make sure that you make wise choices.

Unsubscribe. Invest 30 seconds into cancelling the myriad newsletters and promotional emails that you are either not interested in or that you know take up too much of your time for the value they provide.

Use an alternate email address.  Switch things that you want only occasionally to a different email address.  When Borders Books was in business, I found their all-too-frequent emails bothersome.  I didn’t want to cancel them because when I needed a book, I loved using their 30 and 40% off coupons.  So, I had them go to my “junk e-mail address.”  Those emails don’t flow into my regular inbox and I don’t even check them unless I am looking for something specific.

Always carry essential reading.  I always have with me at least one periodical or article reprint that I really want to find time to read.  It’s handy when I have to wait for an appointment or find myself with downtime away from the office.

Pay someone else to research. One of my greatest time sucks is internet research.  Whether I am looking for relevant research studies, business articles, or the latest technology, I find it all so interesting.  I can easily hop from page to page, taking in fascinating articles but also eating up a lot of time.  If I have someone else do research, I get precisely what I need at a much lower cost.

Allocate your time. Decide ahead of time how much time you want to devote to email and the subsequent threads that are inevitably generated there.  If you decide on 30 minutes, then stick with it and make your choices.  One recent morning, my husband sent me a New York Times link to several vegetarian recipes.  I was busy.  I had work to do.  I was torn but I made my choice.  I downloaded the recipes with no regrets.  Then I stuck to my time limit and moved on.

Posted in Stress, Time Management | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Leaders under fire and National Stress Awareness month

stressWhether you call it stress, overwhelm, or some other name, I constantly hear from leaders that they are pulled in too many directions, expected to multitask relentlessly, and have significantly more input and information coming in than they can ever effectively process.  In short, they live their lives as though they are constantly under fire.

As a result, many leaders are anxious and unable to sleep despite exhaustion, suffer impingements on family and personal time and, yet, still have a sense of not really ever getting anything done.  They lament to me “If only I could get a better handle on my time management.”

April is Nation Stress Awareness month.  During this month, I will write a series of short articles about the things that leaders do (and that are done to them) that leave them stressed out and less productive.  We’ll look at what leaders can do to take control and feel more centered, relaxed, and productive again.

We’ll examine this issue of time management and see if there isn’t another way to frame it.  After all, can we really manage “time?”  We all get the same 24 hours a day.  No one gets more or less.  We cannot create time or make more of it.  So is it time that we need to learn to manage?  Or it is our ourselves?  Perhaps we simply need a new approach.

Posted in Stress, Time Management | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

More debate: Are women better leaders than men?

Woman winning raceIn the last two weeks, much has been made of a study that claims that women are better leaders than men.  In a Harvard Business Review blog post on March 15, 2012, the authors of the study, Jack Zenger and Joseph Folkman, wrote that women outperformed men in 12 of 16 leadership competencies, according to data gathered from 360 degree feedback surveys.  (click here for HBR 3/15/12 post)

My experience.  I admit, when I first saw the article, I sighed.  The debate over the effectiveness of female leaders versus the effectiveness of male leaders has raged for the longest time and I suspect it has grown rather stale.

I’ve worked for outstanding female AND male leaders.  (I’ve also worked for a few of each that had some pretty significant room for development.)  In my coaching practice, I coach both male and female leaders, and I’ve had the same experience.  I see many of the same issues and strengths from both men and women.

Although the stereotype (and this survey) tell us that women are more nurturing, I find myself just as likely to be brought in by a male leader to provide leadership development services within his organization as I am to be brought in by a woman.

The data. None the less, the data is compelling.  On 36 of the 49 items that were surveyed, women outperformed men notably in areas relating to drive for results, initiative, communication, and relationships.  While men scored better than women in technical expertise, innovation, and strategic perspective, women scored better on leadership effectiveness overall.

The authors don’t offer an explanation for why women performed better overall in the study.  They do tell us is that the companies that the leaders worked for were ‘high performing’, however, they do not qualify or quantify that.  They also tell us that female leaders were outnumbered by male leaders by about two to one on average in these companies.  At the top of the organizations, the ratio was closer to five to one.  They conclude that if organizations put more women on their leadership teams, overall effectiveness would increase.

My conclusion.  I don’t take issue with the study.  These were the results from this particular survey in this particular set of companies.

But I do have a concern that in our haste to sum up the qualities of a group, we may lose sight of the fact that leaders are individuals, each with their own strengths, blind spots, and beliefs that govern their behavior and ultimately, their effectiveness.

Each leader must be responsible for reflecting on their own experience and determining the growth and development they will commit to in the name of becoming their best leadership self.

Posted in Leadership development, Women leaders | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leadership and music: Being versus doing

In my last post, I talked about the need for leaders to get comfortable with ambiguity.  One of the reasons that leaders are often so uncomfortable with ambiguity is that they focus so much on doing, instead of focusing on being.

Being is the character, the beliefs, the YOU that you bring to leadership.  But aspiring leaders try to learn the leadership rule book instead of focusing on the inner competencies that most impact great leadership.

Analogous to music.  The distinction can be a difficult one for the uninitiated, but music offers us a great analogy.

I’m learning to play the piano.  My big ambition is to be able to pick up a piece of sheet music for a song that I like and play it competently.  My piano teacher, Roy, has different ambitions for me.

Recently, Roy said that, while learning a piece of sheet music would undoubtedly help me learn and refine certain motor skills, he wants me to understand what I’ll call the “context” of my music (my words, not his).  He wants me to learn the underlying structure or framework and then build on it and apply it in my way.

He says that this will not only allow me to improvise with other musicians, but to create my own music.  More fundamentally, it will allow me to play with feeling and emotion because the music will be mine.

Because he knows his student well, he lets me work on learning sheet music that I like. At the same time, he insists that I learn music theory and work on simple pieces that I am to modify by applying what I learn.

Learning leadership and learning music.  I smile to myself because I do the same thing when I work with Leaders.  Leaders often, uncomfortable with ambiguity, want me to give them concrete “how-to” information, which is very similar to my desire to have a piece of sheet music in front of me.

But I also urge leaders to attempt to make meaning of what they are learning and to reflect on and personalize new learning so that the learning fundamentally changes how they look at their leadership. While this is the hard work of developing your leadership, in the long term it is what will give you the power to move confidently through uncertainty.

To grow and to learn, both leaders and musicians have to make their own music.  Just as a musician playing music straight from the heart inspires his listeners, an authentic leader that is centered and grounded even in the midst of ambiguity enables her followers.

For the time being, I will probably still work on learning favorite pieces of sheet music as this is my comfort zone (and I really want to nail that Billy Joel song).  But, I put an equal amount of time this week into learning and improvising chord inversions to accompany the  melodies in my book (because I eventually want to play the Billy Joel song like it is my own).

Posted in Ambiguity, Leadership development | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leaders, Get comfortable with ambiguity

Sometimes when I work with leaders, they struggle with ambiguity.  They want all the facts before they make a decision.  They want to memorize a script before an important presentation.  They don’t want to take questions for fear of not having answers.

While I understand the urge to want to be certain, have all the facts, and be prepared, the problem with it is that leaders seldom have all the facts.  Things just move too fast.  And even if things slowed down a bit (that’s not going to happen) there are things that a leader is never going to know – how someone else might react for instance.

Not being able to cope with uncertainty paralyzes leaders.  It makes them appear indecisive at best and, worse, as inauthentic. While leaders sit and struggle with the ambiguity that is inherent is any leadership situation, the world moves on and opportunity is lost.

I coached a leader who, despite his fine reputation for being smart and committed, was also seen as a bit indecisive.  That frustrated him.  He wasn’t indecisive, he protested.  He was just careful and wanted to have all the facts before blurting out a position.  He had to get comfortable with the fact that he was never going to have all the facts and had a team and his own CEO who needed him to take a stand sooner than later.

Years ago I allowed someone on my team to convince me not to take questions when I held company information meetings.  We had a diverse group of employees from the warehouse to the administrative offices. You have no idea what some rabble-rouser will say, he reasoned.  You’ll get questions we can’t answer, he said.

I listened and that was dumb.  Yeah, whenever you stand up in front of a few hundred people and have no idea what they might say, there’s a lot of ambiguity.  And that can be scary.  But I missed a golden opportunity to really connect, to really communicate because, let’s face it, real communication is two-way.

Fortunately, I got over that and today, when I give presentations, I encourage both questions and comments, not just at the end but throughout.  I want to know what people are thinking, if what I am saying is resonating with them, and how they think they can (or cannot) apply it.

Yeah, I get a curve ball every once in a while – the person who swears that whatever I’m offering “just won’t work with the people that I have to deal with” – and I’ve learned to see it as a gift.  It tells me when, despite my efforts, I haven’t yet connected.  It gives me the opportunity, before it’s too late, to try again or to understand what about their position I have missed.

If you want to be a great leader, you’ve got to get comfortable with ambiguity.  Accept that you may not ever have all the facts or ever be able to read minds.  Otherwise, you risk being gripped by inertia and mediocrity.

Posted in Ambiguity, Self-management | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment